If an offender claims they are subject to "common law" and not Florida Statute requirements, what type of individual is this likely to exemplify?

The individual claiming to be subject to "common law" rather than specific Florida Statute requirements is likely exemplifying characteristics associated with a sovereign citizen. Sovereign citizens are people who believe that they can choose which laws to obey and often disregard statutory laws, claiming they are only bound by common law or their interpretation of it. They typically argue that government authority doesn't apply to them, utilizing a distorted understanding of legal principles to justify their actions. This belief system can lead to conflicts with law enforcement and legal institutions, as they may resist or refuse compliance with standard legal procedures and statutes.

The other options mention roles that involve engaging with the law constructively or are based on adherence to societal norms. A legal advocate works within the legal framework to represent others, a model citizen adheres to laws and regulations, and a community reformer actively seeks to improve societal structures through legitimate means. Each of these roles contrasts with the sovereign citizen ideology, which fundamentally rejects the authority of statutory law.