What action does the sentencing authority take when they decide to continue supervision with no additional sanctions despite a violation of probation?

When the sentencing authority decides to continue supervision without implementing additional sanctions following a probation violation, they are essentially choosing to reinstate supervision. This means that they acknowledge the violation but believe that the individual can still benefit from remaining under supervision without further punitive measures. This decision often reflects confidence in the probationer's ability to comply with the conditions of probation moving forward.

Reinstating supervision allows the individual to remain under guidance and monitoring, which is essential for their rehabilitation and reintegration into society. The authority may provide encouragement or resources to support the probationer, affirming their commitment to addressing the underlying issues that may have led to the violation.

The other options reflect different actions that imply a more severe approach to the violation. Terminating supervision unsuccessfully indicates that the individual would be seen as having failed their probation, while modifying supervision would imply changes to the terms of probation, often resulting in increased restrictions. Revoking supervision, on the other hand, involves ending the probation altogether, which would lead the individual back into the justice system.