What action must be taken following a Re-Review (REVW) entry by a supervisor?

When a Re-Review (REVW) entry is made by a supervisor, it typically indicates that there were specific errors or omissions that need to be addressed. The purpose of the Re-Review is to ensure that all records and documentation are accurate and complete, reflecting the current status and circumstances of the case. Therefore, the most appropriate action is to correct any identified errors or omissions as directed by the supervisor's feedback from the Re-Review process.

This action is crucial for maintaining the integrity of records, ensuring compliance with legal and procedural standards, and supporting the overall objective of effective supervision and rehabilitation of offenders. Addressing these errors promptly helps to minimize any potential negative impact on the offender's case or supervision process.

The other options do not directly align with the action required following a Re-Review. Filing a formal complaint typically pertains to grievances or misconduct rather than routine documentation corrections, while submitting a request for training suggests a need for further education, which may not be necessary immediately after a Re-Review. Changing the offender's status immediately also does not correlate directly with responding to a Re-Review, as changes to status should be based on policy and appropriate procedures that are not merely prompted by a supervisory review.